Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Evaluation of dental status using a questionnaire before administration of general anesthesia for the prevention of dental injuries

Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2023³â 23±Ç 1È£ p.9 ~ 17
ÀÌ°æÁø, ±è¼­¿­, ¹Ú°æ¹Ì, ¾ç¼öÁø, ±è±â´ö, ¹Ú¿ø¼­,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌ°æÁø ( Lee Kyung-Jin ) - Yonsei University College of Medicine Yongin Severance Hospital Department of Advanced General Dentistry
±è¼­¿­ ( Kim Seo-Yul ) - Yonsei University College of Dentistry Department of Advanced General Dentistry
¹Ú°æ¹Ì ( Park Kyeong-Mee ) - Yonsei University College of Dentistry Department of Advanced General Dentistry
¾ç¼öÁø ( Yang Su-Jin ) - Yonsei University College of Dentistry Department of Advanced General Dentistry
±è±â´ö ( Kim Kee-Deog ) - Yonsei University College of Dentistry Department of Advanced General Dentistry
¹Ú¿ø¼­ ( Park Won-Se ) - Yonsei University College of Dentistry Department of Advanced General Dentistry

Abstract


Background: Dental evaluation and protection are important for preventing traumatic dental injuries when patients are under general anesthesia. The objective of the present study was to develop a questionnaire based on dentition-related risk factors that could serve as a valuable tool for dental evaluation and documentation.

Methods: We developed a questionnaire for dental evaluation before administration of general anesthesia, investigated the association between patient-and-dentist responses and mouthguard fabrication, and assessed response agreement between 100 patients.

Results: Protective mouthguards were fabricated for 27 patients who were identified as having a high risk of dental injury. There was a strong association between dentists¡¯ responses and mouthguard fabrication, depending on the general oral health status, use of ceramic prosthesis, presence of masticatory pain related to periodontal diseases, gingival edema, and implants (P < 0.05). Response agreement between patients and dentists for items related to dental pain, loss of dental pulp vitality, root canal therapy, dental trauma, aesthetic prosthesis, tooth mobility, and implant prosthesis was high (Cohen¡¯s kappa coefficient ¥ê ¡Ã 0.6).

Conclusions: A high agreement was observed between patient-dentist responses and a strong association with mouthguard fabrication for items pertaining to ceramic prosthesis, masticatory pain, and dental implants. Patients with a ¡°yes¡± response to these items are recommended to undergo a dental evaluation and use a dental protective device while under general anesthesia.

Å°¿öµå

Anesthesia, General; Mouth Protectors; Surveys and Questionnaires

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI